GFX 50s Ii vs Sony A7r Iv: Which is better?

Because of its 50MP, however, the GF lenses make it easy to take full use of its capabilities. If you want to catch fast-moving subjects or low-light photographs without the need for a flash, this is the tool for you. The size of a camera’s sensor is an essential consideration. The bigger the sensor, the better the low-light performance, the dynamic range, and the overall picture quality will be. Up-and-coming photographers looking for a medium format digital camera, as well as those who plan to use it as a back-up for their GFX100S, will benefit most from the GFX50S II.

Sony Alpha A7R IV

If you were looking for a cheap medium-format camera, Fujifilm wasn’t the first—the Pentax 645D is a good place to start. However, the system hasn’t seen a new model since 2014’s 645Z. Typical Negative Tripod photographers will appreciate the IBIS system’s versatility. This camera incorporates a multi-shot mode that moves the sensor by a half-pixel and takes 16 shots in rapid succession. GFX50S II There is no requirement for interpolation with the shift, but you must input your files via the Pixel Shift Combiner desktop tool in order to benefit from the 200MP output.

Sony A7r Iv Sony Alpha A7R IV and Fujifilm GFX 50S II vs. Fujifilm Gfx 50s Ii

In-body image stabilization is included on the 50S II, as it is on the GFX 100 and 100S, but the five-axis image stabilization technology offers a compensation rating of up to 6.5 stops. Fast AF with Eye-AF tracking, 10fps bursts at full resolution, improved ergonomics, dual UHS-II card slots, and a higher-resolution EVF are just a few of the features that make this camera stand out. Slow AF; Cannot match with high-end full-frame cameras in terms of performance; So yet, just a few native lenses are available. Costly add-ons; mediocre JPEG dynamic range; maximum sync speed of 1/125s with a flash. A single charge of the NP-FZ100 power pack lasts for 670 shots on the A7R IV, while the GFX 50S II’s NP-W235 battery provides 440 shots. USB charging of the battery packs of both cameras is quite handy while traveling. If you want crisper photos, you should use phase-detection autofocus instead of contrast detection autofocus.

A comparison of features

Fujifilm GFX 50S II vs Sony Alpha A7R IV

There is a direct correlation between sensor size and picture quality in digital cameras. The bigger the pixel-units of a sensor, the higher the sensor’s low-light sensitivity, dynamic range, and color depth will be compared to smaller pixels in a sensor of the same generation. If you want to isolate a subject from its backdrop, a big sensor camera gives you more creative alternatives when employing narrow depth of focus. Larger sensors are more costly, and they lead to larger and heavier cameras and lenses as a side effect of this.

Sony Alpha A7R IV vs Fujifilm GFX 50S II

The NP-W235 battery in the GFX50S II is different from that in the NP-W235. CIPA rates it at 400 exposures per charge, but in fact, you’re more likely to get 600 or 700 exposures out of it. The Canon EOS R5 can only take 320 photographs, whereas the Sony a7R IV can take 530. The EVF gives you a good idea of what your scene will look like, including any special effects you’ve applied. The GFX 50S’s 0.85x EVF is smaller than the 0.85x EVF Fujifilm employed in the previous GFX 50S, but it meets full-frame competition in terms of magnification. The physical interface is supplemented with the Q menu, a pop-up menu with 12 customisable spaces.

Leave a Reply